The Negative and Terrible Implications of Cashless Policy on Money Lenders

The Negative and Terrible Implications of Cashless Policy on Money Lenders

Introduction

There has been widespread agreement that eliminating the need for cash in everyday transactions is a step in the right direction for improving financial inclusion worldwide. Yet, this strategy has certain unfavorable effects for money lenders because of their reliance on cash transactions.

Terrible Implications of Cashless Policy on Money Lenders

The cashless policy has had a devastating effect on moneylenders, who have seen a significant drop in business as a direct result of the program. Electronic payment systems, such as bank transfers, credit/debit cards, and mobile payments, are gaining popularity as the world moves toward a cashless future. As a result, fewer individuals will seek out the services of money lenders, since banks and credit unions will be more accessible to them through online and mobile payment systems. Because of this decline, moneylenders may see less business and less profit. The cost of doing business for moneylenders is also likely to be affected by the cashless policy.

Loan companies that accept electronic payments are sometimes subject to transaction fees. As a result, lenders will have to charge borrowers higher interest rates to cover their increased borrowing costs. Borrowers may feel financially strained by these increased rates, and as a result, they may decide not to repay their debts. In addition, the cashless policy exposes money lenders and their customers to the dangers of cybercrime, fraud, and identity theft. Hacking, phishing, and other cyber-attacks pose a threat to online transactions. Fraud, financial crimes, and even identity theft can all be committed if cybercriminals get their hands on the personal information of lenders and their customers.

Money lenders risk losing revenue, credibility, and maybe even litigation if their reputation is harmed in this way. However, because of difficulties like creditworthiness, liquidity, or regulatory restrictions, financial institutions might demand exorbitant transaction costs or cut off lending privileges if a business opts for a cashless strategy.

The need for immediate cash is on the decline, making it difficult for moneylenders to compete with banks and other more established forms of lending. Insolvency, bankruptcy, and the eventual shutdown of a firm can result from a lack of competitiveness. Last but not least, employees in the money lending business may lose their positions due to the cashless policy. As a result of losing customers, some moneylenders may have to lay off workers or go out of business entirely, which would increase the overall number of people without job. This may have a negative impact on the economy by lowering consumer confidence and so contributing to a drop in GDP.

In summary

The financial industry as a whole, including money lenders, will be affected positively and negatively by the cashless policy. Cashless policies have their advantages, such as enhanced transparency and speed in transactions, but they also have risks, such as a drop in clientele, higher operating costs, the exposure of sensitive information to hackers, job losses, and even bankruptcy. The government, regulatory agencies, and interested parties must take precautions to soften the policy’s blow on the money lending industry.